Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Stone v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Alfred Lee Stone
Respondent:
Jimmy S. Smith, Internal Revenue Service and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Marshall v. Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2021cv00859
Respondent:
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Gerald Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2019cv00554
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Demareale J. Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bussie v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2016cv01078
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. McCorkle et al
as 5:2016hc02139
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
C/O McCorkle, Thomas Smith, Mark Hornack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bussie v. Clerk of Court et al
as 5:2015hc02310
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
Clerk of Court, Unit Managers, Psychologist/Psychiatric Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Internal Revenue Service
as 6:2015cv03106
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Robinson
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanora #142154 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv02523
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Teresa Sanders and others
Petitioner:
Joshua Sanora
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JUSTIN v. USA
as 1:2012cv01282
Petitioner:
RODNEY K. JUSTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
