Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Randle v. Higgins
as 4:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Justice Department, State Circuit Court and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Slusser v. Attorney General, State of Floridaa et al
as 3:2017cv00235
Petitioner:
Rodney R Slusser
Respondent:
State of Michigan, State of Indiana and US Justice department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Coakley et al
as 5:2016cv00173
Petitioner:
Charles Clark
Respondent:
J. Coakley, Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Green v. Fox et al
as 1:2013cv00411
Petitioner:
Cornelious Joseph Green
Respondent:
John B Fox and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Fox et al
as 1:2013cv00231
Petitioner:
Brandon Keith Hill
Respondent:
John B Fox and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coleman v. Fox et al
as 1:2012cv00465
Petitioner:
Edward H Coleman
Respondent:
John Fox and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bayo v. U. S. Justice / Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2012cv02256
Petitioner:
Moustapha Bayo
Respondent:
U. S. Justice / Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carpenter v. U.S. Justice Department Federal Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2012cv00688
Petitioner:
Eric Demone Carpenter
Respondent:
U.S. Justice Department Federal Bureau of Prison and Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ford v. Justice Department et al
as 1:2012cv00607
Petitioner:
Kelvin Ford
Respondent:
Justice Department , Federal Bureau of Prisons and H. A. Rios, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eduardo Mario Lavadenz v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 8:2012cv00414
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security, Eric H Holder Jr, U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Mario Lavadenz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
