General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,126
FIELDS v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00291
Petitioner: JAY JAMES FIELDS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ian Cultrona v. Jay Forshey
as 24-3489
Petitioner: IAN A. CULTRONA
Respondent: JAY FORSHEY, Warden
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff: Jay James Fields
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carlin Powell v. Jay Forshey
as 24-3460
Petitioner: CARLIN U. POWELL
Respondent: JAY FORSHEY, Warden
Strausbaugh #949492 v. Braman
as 1:2024cv00549
Petitioner: C. Jay Strausbaugh #949492
Respondent: Melinda Braman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strausbaugh v. Braman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11321
Petitioner: C. Jay Strausbaugh
Respondent: Melinda Braman
MILLER v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner: RANDY JAY MILLER
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, SUPERINTENDANT OF S.C.I. MERCER and PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotharp v. Joseph We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00858
Petitioner: Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent: Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Armbrister We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03018
Petitioner: Malachi Samuel Thomas
Respondent: Douglas County District Courts and Jay Armbrister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goldstein, Robert v. United States Of America
as 9:2024cv80050
Plaintiff: Robert Jay Goldstein
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?