Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Mayers v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv01240
Petitioner:
Breon Jacoby Mayers
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayers v. Warden Antonelli
as 0:2024cv01033
Petitioner:
Breon Mayers
Respondent:
Warden Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rothschild v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Mayer A. Rothschild and Thomas A. Cady
Respondent:
State of California and Steven Wagstaffe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayer v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Karl Andrew Mayer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephen Mayer v. Warden
as 23-13350
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN MAYER
Respondent / Appellee:
FCI MIAMI WARDEN
Mayer v. Warden, FCI Miami
as 1:2023cv22874
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mayer
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Miami
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mayer v. Radtke
as 2:2022cv00644
Petitioner:
Lonny A Mayer
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayer v. Johns et al
as 5:2020cv00028
Petitioner:
Stephen Mayer
Respondent:
The GEO Group, Inc., United States of America and T. Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cota v. Mayer City Justice Court et al
as 3:2019cv08349
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Mayer City Justice Court, Bill Rummer and others
Petitioner:
Jacob Anthony Cota
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, John Lowe, Yavapai, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberson v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00294
Respondent:
Murfreesboro Police Department, Jaymes Mayer and State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Kenneth Roberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
