General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Brinson v. Macomb Correctional Facility
as 2:2023cv12658
Petitioner: Michael Lee Brinson, II
Respondent: Macomb Correctional Facility
Michael Lee Hodges Sr. v. Birkholz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02151
Petitioner: Michael Lee Hodges Sr.
Respondent: Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Michael Crane v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15031
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL LEE CRANE
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, UNKNOWN FREELAND and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
MYERS v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv02720
Petitioner: MICHAEL MYERS and MICHAEL LEE MYERS
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crane v. Freeland et al
as 2:2022cv00905
Petitioner: Michael Lee Crane
Respondent: Unknown Freeland and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Boyles v. Troy Bowser
as 22-35313
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL LEE BOYLES
Respondent / Appellee: TROY BOWSER, Warden
Michael Gordon v. Chris Tripp
as 22-1684
Petitioner / Appellant: Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent / Appellee: Chris Tripp, Warden
Smith v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-7007
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL LEE SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, DOR Director
Anderson v. Payne We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00197
Plaintiff: Michael Lee Anderson
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Tripp
as 4:2022cv00036
Petitioner: Michael Lee Gordon
Respondent: Chris Tripp
Interested Party: Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?