Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valenzuela v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02293
Petitioner:
Armando Medrano Valenzuela
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEDRANO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20303
Petitioner:
FERNANDO DUARTE MEDRANO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony James Medrano v. Kevin Hixton
as 2:2023cv06431
Petitioner:
Anthony James Medrano
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medrano v. Dixon et al
as 7:2023cv00759
Petitioner:
Erica Medrano
Respondent:
Dixon, Skinner and Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medrano v. Salmonson
as 5:2023cv00054
Petitioner:
David Medrano
Respondent:
Warden Salmonson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gondres-Medrano v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Petitioner:
Maximo H. Gondres-Medrano
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jesus Medrano, Jr. v. Lori Davis, Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2020cv00654
Petitioner:
Jesus Medrano, Jr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Medrano v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv00860
Petitioner:
Arturo S Medrano
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Medrano v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2020cv00078
Petitioner:
Mario Alberto Medrano
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
