Cases 1 - 10 of 1,741
Flook v. Haynes
as 2:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
Roger W Flook, Jr.
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Lumpkin
as 24-20169
Petitioner:
Victor Charles Rogers
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Salazar-Salazar (PS) v. Celia
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner:
Roger Javier Salazar-Salazar
Respondent:
Celia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lobley v. Harris
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Terrell Onterial Lobley
Respondent:
Don Harris
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Larry Darnell Murphy
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrep #309512 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01303
Petitioner:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gines v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Tommy Gines, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner:
SEAN ROGERS
Respondent:
WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
