Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Anderson v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Defendant:
Interim Assistant Thomas R. Kane, Attorney General William Barr, Interim Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Timothy Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lyttle v. Kane
as 5:2019hc02013
Petitioner:
Melvin Ray Lyttle
Respondent:
Thomas R Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DeHart v. Streeval et al
as 0:2018cv00074
Respondent:
J. C. Streeval, Ian Connors, Jefferson Sessions and others
Petitioner:
Matthew DeHart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01176
Petitioner:
Brian Antwanine Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America, Thomas R. Kane, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. KANE et al
as 1:2017cv04978
Petitioner:
BRIAN ANTWANIN JOHNSON
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00318
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Petitioner:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LOFFREDI v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00314
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE and J.E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
ROBERT LOFFREDI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMOOT v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00309
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS R. KANE, KRUGER and others
Petitioner:
DONALD SMOOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LYTTLE v. KANE
as 2:2017cv00200
Respondent:
THOMAS R. KANE
Petitioner:
MELVIN R. LYTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Waters v. Rios et al
as 0:2017cv01367
Petitioner:
John Joseph Waters, Jr.
Respondent:
M. Rios , William True, III , Thomas R. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
