Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Brooks v. Carter et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Brooks Walter and Walter James Brooks
Defendant:
Karen Carter and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Unknown
as 3:2021cv00666
Plaintiff:
Walter James Brown
Defendant:
Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Adams v. Davis
as 7:2020cv00265
Respondent:
C. Davis
Petitioner:
Walter James Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00152
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Walter James Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00047
Respondent:
David Shinn and Mark Brnovich
Petitioner:
Walter James Van, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv01320
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Florida Attorney General, The Florida Parole Commission and others
Petitioner:
Walter James rMorris, Jr. and Walter James Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al, (Duval County)
as 3:2018cv01491
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Walter James Morris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2016cv01317
Petitioner:
Walter James Morris, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Florida and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walter Hart, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 16-1088
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER JAMES HART, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL
Hart #606819 v. Campbell
as 1:2015cv01282
Petitioner:
Walter James Hart #606819, Jr.
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
