Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01873
Petitioner:
Ray Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv01463
Petitioner:
Michael James Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Shonelle Jackson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Trammell
as 13-5119
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHELTON JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL
Jackson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00315
Petitioner:
Etheria Verdel Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
as 2:2011cv01016
Plaintiff:
Bennie Adams , Stanley Adams , Tyrone Ballew and others
Defendant:
John Kasich , Gary C Mohr , Donald Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kareem Jackson v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 10-4592
Petitioner - Appellee:
KAREEM JACKSON
Respondent - Appellant:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Henry Jackson, Jr. v. Christopher Epps, Commissioner
as 10-70029
Petitioner - Appellant:
HENRY CURTIS JACKSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jackson v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01039
Movant:
David Lee Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jerry Jackson v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY TERRELL JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LORETTA K. KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
