Cases 21 - 30 of 248
LE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05869
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, ROBERT GILMORE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
TAM M. LE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
CLEMONS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01545
Petitioner:
JORDAN ALEXANDER CLEMONS
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
PURKEY v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv03214
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, T.J. WATSON and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY IRA PURKEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Fitzgerald v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05219
Respondent:
Stephan Morris, Joe Profiri, Charles L Ryan and others
Petitioner:
John Vincent Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RIVERA v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv01155
Petitioner:
WILLIAM RIVERA
Respondent:
SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT STEVEN GLUNT and .SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
Watson v. Gittere et al
as 2:2019cv00379
Respondent:
Warden Bill Gittere and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
John Matthias Watson, III and John Matthias Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00086
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THAT STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN WETZEL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADLEPHIA
Petitioner:
LEWIS M. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp
Jacoby v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2018cv02000
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, PA State Attorney General, Robert Gilmore and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Matthew Jacoby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Calhoun v. Dunn et al
as 1:2018cv00874
Petitioner:
John Russell Calhoun
Respondent:
Jefferson Dunn and Steve Marshall
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rubio v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00088
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
John Allen Rubio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
