Cases 31 - 40 of 107
John Esposito v. Warden
as 15-11384
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN ANTHONY ESPOSITO
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Sanchez v. Trammell
as 15-6043
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY SANCHEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Anthony Washington v. Commissioner of Pennsylvania D, et al
as 15-9001
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMISSIONER OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI
MORGAN v. OVERMEYER et al
as 2:2015cv00031
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MORGAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENEARAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Thomas et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2014cv01017
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyd
Defendant:
Kim T. Thomas, Walter Myers and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05452
Petitioner:
ANTHONY REID
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and STEVEN R. GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
REID v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05451
Petitioner:
ANTHONY REID
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and STEVEN R. GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grant v. Trammell
as 14-6131
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT
Respondent - Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Steven Butler v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-70018
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN ANTHONY BUTLER
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
William Rousan v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1919
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William L. Rousan
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
