Cases 11 - 20 of 98
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lankford v. White Bluff/Dickson Co. TN Police Dept./Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2021cv00625
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jane Lankford
Defendant:
White Bluff/Dickson Co. TN Police Dept./Sheriff's Dept., Dickson Co. Jail, Judge f/n/u Baucomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Jackie Bird, et al
as 7:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Elbert Cassay, Jackie Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Micheal Goss, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Polk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2020cv03048
Defendant:
Garrett Anderson, Polk County Sheriff's Office, Rich Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Lankford et al
as 3:2019cv02406
Defendant:
Joe Lankford, David Stromski, R. Buckel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2019cv01827
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lankford and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. Overstreet et al
as 1:2019cv00607
Defendant:
Adam W. Overstreet, Kenyen R. Brown, William Ryan Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
David P. Petersen, I
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2019cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lankford and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. Overstreet et al
as 8:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
David P. Peterson
Defendant:
Adam W. Overstreet, William Ryan Kennedy, Kristina Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Varnum et al
as 2:2019cv14107
Defendant:
Captain B. Varnum, Colonel J. T. Lankford and Sargeant J. Wilkerson
Plaintiff:
Sean I. Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
