Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Billiot et al v. Louisiana Pardon and Parole Board Members et al
as 2:2019cv12849
Defendant:
Louisiana Pardon and Parole Board Members, Jim Wise, Alvin Roche, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Lacy Billiot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Pope et al
as 4:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jessie James Whitaker
Defendant:
William A Baldwell, Thomas D Deen, Dustin Codie Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Watson et al
as 4:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Officer Altice, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jakubowski v. Michigan State Parole Board Members et al
as 2:2018cv14077
Defendant:
Melissa Brant, Brian Shipman, Jerome Warfield and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence John Jakubowski
Muhammad v. Jennings et al
as 2:2018cv14073
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members, Rick Snyder, Daniel J. Kely and others
Plaintiff:
Umar Muhammad
HEGWOOD v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS et al
as 1:2018cv02281
Defendant:
CHRIS TANIS, MR. BUTTS, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HEGWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hegwood v. Indiana Parole Board Members et al
as 3:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael A Hegwood
Defendant:
Mr Butts, Indiana Parole Board Members, Charles Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Petroski v. Adriarre Bennett
as 18-6473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE PETROSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIARRE J. BENNETT, Virginia Parole Board Member and KENNETH WILLIAM STOLLE, Sheriff Virginia Beach Correctional Center
McGore v. Michigan Parole Board Members et al
as 2:2018cv10355
Plaintiff:
Darryl McGore
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board Members, Michael Egan and Bill Schuette
Thomas Ebron v. Karen D. Brown
as 17-6622
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EBRON
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN D. BROWN, Chair, VA. Parole Board and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Members
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
