Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Washington v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2015cv00269
Defendant:
Mary Anthony, N. Burl Cain, Jacqueline Darby and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooker v. US, et al
as 15-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL HOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSE BELANGER, SPENCER CHRISTIE, CLAIRMONT FORDE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and FEDERAL MARSHALS SERVICE
Hooker v. Pruntytown Correctional Center et al
as 2:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Larry Don Hooker
Defendant:
Pruntytown Correction Center, Debra Minnix and Wexford Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yohe v. Owens et al
as 5:2014ct03315
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Ernie Yohe, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Owens, Denise Hooker, Tommy L. Page, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
La Tidtus Jones v. James Moore, et al
as 14-60740
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MOORE, Warden, LIEUTENANT STANDLEY DOUGLAS, OCTAVIOUS HARRIS and others
La Tidtus Jones v. Marily Kelly, et al
as 14-60633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
MARILY L. KELLY, Clerk, BOLIVAR COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK'S OFFICE, LORETTA JONES, Deputy Clerk and others
La Tidtus Jones v. James Moore, Warden, et al
as 14-60419
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LA TIDTUS JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES MOORE, Warden, LIEUTENANT STANDLEY DOUGLAS, OCTAVIOUS HARRIS and others
Justin Poole v. J. Raseknia et al
as 2:2014cv03814
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Muriel Hooker, Muriel Hooker and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Poole
Hooker v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00330
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Plaintiff:
Tory Hooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Best v. Richy et al
as 6:2014cv00180
Plaintiff:
Anthony Best, Shelton Johnson, Jason Ortega and others
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce and John Rupert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
