Cases 31 - 40 of 44
HOLMES v. FINK et al
as 1:2015cv00212
Plaintiff:
ELLISON RAY HOLMES
Defendant:
GARY L. FINK, AMY M. LEEPER, RICHARD HADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Fink et al
as 5:2015ct03061
Plaintiff:
Ellison Ray Holmes
Defendant:
Gary L. Fink, Amy M. Leeper, Richard Hadley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLERY v. RODREGUEZ et al
as 2:2014cv06685
Plaintiff:
KAREEM TILLERY
Defendant:
DEBRA RODREGUEZ, KILLIMET, JOSEPH DEVLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. Phillips et al
as 9:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Rakim Tillery
Defendant:
Phillips, Michelle, Head of Food Service Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Wilson et al
as 4:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael A Powell
Defendant:
Sharen Wilson, Ben Leonaro, Danielle DeGualt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Tillery et al
as 3:2010cv01634
Plaintiff:
Michael W Rose
Defendant:
Clovis Tillery, Pat Book, Missy Cowart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. McCullough et al
as 3:2010cv00838
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Webster
Defendant:
McCullough, Vernon Correctional Facility, Allen Cupp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Mann et al
as 5:2009ct03071
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Tillery
Defendant:
Charles L. Mann, Sr., Willis J. Fowler, Andrew P. Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Floyd v. Anderson et al (INMATE2)
as 1:2008cv00938
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jamaal Floyd
Defendant:
Larry Anderson, David Atwell and Cassandra Tillery
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
James Latham, Jr. v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BENNETT LATHAM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, HELEN F. FAHEY, Chairman of the Virginia Parole Board, FRED SHILLING, Director of Health Services, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
