Cases 41 - 50 of 1,807
Goodrum v. New River Township et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Keith Goodrum
Defendant:
New River Township, Churchill County Sheriiff's Dept., Jesse Nuckails and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gulley v. Howell et al.
as 1:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jesse-James Gulley, Jr.
Defendant:
Aaron P. Howell, James S. Gwin, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Eloy, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jesse Allen Holmes
Defendant:
Eloy, City of and Tyler Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mount v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Robert Jesse Mount
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaffin v. Reno County Correctional Facility Mental Health et al
as 5:2024cv03020
Plaintiff:
Dusty Ray Chaffin
Defendant:
Reef Mental Health, (fnu) Gillion, Jesse Landes and others
Interested Party:
Reno County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Washington v. C. LA Priam
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Jesse Washington
Defendant:
C. LA Priam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Karklin v. O'Bell Winn, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROY KARKLIN
Defendant:
O'BELL T. WINN, GARY MINIARD, CARROLL WALKER and others
Stiltner v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jesse Ryan Stiltner
Defendant:
Patrisha McCoy, Loretta Burkett and Johnny Billiter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sepulvado v. Thomas et al
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Sepulvado, Jr
Defendant:
Daniel Thomas, Berlin Sweet, Jesse W Branam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. GOODRIDGE
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
JESSE W. HALL
Defendant:
JOHN GOODRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
