Cases 41 - 50 of 441
Walker v. Marathon GBR et al
as 2:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
William Walker
Defendant:
Marathon GBR, Jeffrey Cornelius, City of Texas City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROCK v. LIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
VINNIE ROCK
Defendant:
LONNIE LIGGINS, DERRIK MALONE and ANTONIO KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PEREZ v. LIGGINS et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
ERIC PEREZ
Defendant:
LONNIE LIGGINS, DERRIK MALONE and ANTONIO KIMBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Malone v. State of Nevada
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Dominic Malone
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05238
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Major Randall Denzer, Captain Nolan Ake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLOYD v. MALONE, et al.
as 1:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
EDDIE FRANK FLOYD, III
Defendant:
MS MALONE, OFC THOMPSON, Anthony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05218
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Major Randall Denzer, Captain Nolan Ake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. TDCJ
as 4:2022cv03635
Plaintiff:
William Charles Malone
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
