Cases 41 - 50 of 688
Norris Smith v. Rockingham Regional Jail
as 23-6257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORRIS ELLWOOD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY REGIONAL JAIL
Buchanan v. Kootenai County, et al.
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Paul Buchanan
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriffs Office, Kootenai County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Kootenai County et al
as 2:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Paul Buchanan
Defendant:
Kootenai County, Kootenai County Sheriffs Office, Kootenai County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Tallulah Criminal Justice Complex et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Kelly Nelson Norris
Defendant:
Tallulah Criminal Justice Complex, Major Foreman, Lt Flechter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. ROASKE et al
as 3:2023cv04038
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH DANIELS
Defendant:
ROASKE, JOHN DOE and NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Forrest City Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Jaqwan Norris
Defendant:
Forrest City Police Department and Carl Cannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rumph, et al
as 23-1028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RUMPH, PAPPAY, FLORES and others
Wills v. Eaton et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
James A. Wills
Defendant:
Timothy Eaton, K. Monzon, Matthew Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd et al v TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Andre D Boyd, Norris Hicks, Dennis Mayes and others
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rumph et al
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Jabri J. Johnson and Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Rumph, Pappay, Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
