Cases 41 - 50 of 289
Combs et al v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Gary Combs and James Blackburn
Defendant:
Michael Parris, Stacey Oakes, Mr Jencks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Oak Bend Hospital
as 4:2022cv01753
Plaintiff:
Dimitric A. Knight
Defendant:
Oak Bend Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. Cardova/Galleria Mall Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03659
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Cardova/Galleria Mall Corp., Jacob the Jewler, Rolex Wallaston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony v. Rosenberg et al
as 9:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anthony
Defendant:
Kevin Rosenberg, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCartney v. Curl et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Rick L McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Zack Sebree, Aaron Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10219
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, St. Louis Central Corrections, John Christiansen and others
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Conyers Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Oberkrom et al
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Baker
Defendant:
Kent Oberkrom, Oaks, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hempstead v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00417
Plaintiff:
Harold Hempstead
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams, Steven Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
