Cases 51 - 60 of 142
Nichols v. Hickman
as 4:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Richard B Nichols
Defendant:
Ron Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forewright v. Robertson County Jail et al
as 3:2016cv00015
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Forewright
Defendant:
Robertson County Jail and Cassie l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIEHL v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2015cv07864
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. GIEHL
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, BETTIE HARRIS, ADMINISTRATOR JOHN/JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Harris III v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv06144
Defendant:
Garod Garrison, Correctional Officer Grice, Dr. Richard Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Harris, III
DeRemer v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00128
Plaintiff:
Richard B. DeRemer
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections, Ron Taylor, L. Dean Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Howard v. Little Rock Police Department, et al
as 15-2268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Curtis Ray Howard
Defendant - Appellee:
Little Rock Police Department, Office of the City Attorney, Office of the Public Defender, Little Rock, Arkansas and others
Miller v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv04795
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Dept, Niwdach Zbigniew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray #065477 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00971
Plaintiff:
Ronald Leslie Murray
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Terry Stewart, Samuel Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Afzal et al
as 0:2015cv60984
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Robinson
Defendant:
Faisal Afzal, Becky Lawson, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Potter et al
as 1:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Walter Douglas Jenkins
Defendant:
Richard B. Potter, Olaun A. Simmons, Daryl F. Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
