Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Frederick Opiyo v. H Boehm, et al
as 13-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. OPIYO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY H BOEHM, DEPUTY J. DARLING and DEPUTY WEDGE
Jannetta v. Dayton et al
as 0:2013cv01268
Plaintiff:
David James Jannetta
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Lucinda Jesson, Tim Pawlenty and others
Derek Curtis v. Kenneth Cuccinelli
as 13-6437
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEREK CURTIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, II, Attorney General, PAUL EBERT, Esquire, Commonwealth Attorney, JEANICE WEITHOP, Esq. Asst. Commonwealth Attorney and others
Defendant:
CHERYL WALTON, Attorney, HURLOCK, Director of Security, UNKNOWN CORR OFFICER, Prince William County Regional Adult Detention Center and others
Hooper v. Robbins et al
as 3:2012cv01909
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hooper
Defendant:
Robert Robbins, Troy Siefer, Jim Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Sirmons et al
as 6:2012cv00295
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Green
Defendant:
Marty Sirmons, Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald v. Melendez
as 1:2012cv10453
Plaintiff:
Stanley Donald
Defendant:
Luis Melendez, James Hart, Kenneth Arsenult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darling v. Stolle et al
as 1:2012cv00223
Plaintiff:
Wesley Darling
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, Thompson, Dawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Sirmons et al
as 5:2011cv01378
Plaintiff:
Willie Ray Green
Defendant:
Marty Sirmons, Justin Jones, Debbie Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crowder v. Crowder et al
as 7:2011cv00501
Defendant:
Michael Wayne Crowder and Cheryl Darling Dalton
Plaintiff:
Richard Wayne Crowder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Toleman, et al
as 9:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Michael Cooper
Defendant:
C.O. Toleman, C.O. A. Konsul, C.O. Brockway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
