Cases 61 - 70 of 142
Thomas v. Harris County, Texas
as 4:2016cv02121
Plaintiff:
David J Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grigsby v. Marten, et al
as 16-3163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP ANDRA GRIGSBY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. THOMAS MARTEN, U.S. District Judge, Chief Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, JASON W. HART, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Kansas, ANNETTE B. GURNEY, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Kansas and others
Wells et al v. Annucci et al
as 9:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Peter Wells, Nathaniel Jay, Patrick Jeanty and others
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Jeff McKoy, Harold D. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
Roderick Brown
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice, Sally Quillian Yates, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Tyus
as 1:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Damian J. Thomas
Defendant:
Kenneth Tyus, Karl Nelson and Wanda Lightening
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Rome et al
as 2:2015cv01563
Plaintiff:
Damien Green
Defendant:
Erin E Rome, J Thomas Haley, Kevin J Palmersheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKithen v. Seery et al
as 9:2015cv01109
Plaintiff:
David McKithen
Defendant:
L. Seery, J. Thomas, B. Tyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. The Legal Defense Team for Owaiian M. Jones et al
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Owaiian M. Jones
Defendant:
The Legal Defense Team for Owaiian M. Jones, D. J. Thomas, Charles Ballen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myles v. Thomas
as 1:2015cv20013
Plaintiff:
Albert J Myles
Defendant:
William J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Dickson et al
as 2:2014cv03002
Plaintiff:
Deshone Smith
Defendant:
K Dickson, J. Thomas, J. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
