Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Walker v. Knox et al
as 2:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Markey Walker
Defendant:
Lt. Knox, Officer Hill and Jackson County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Unknown Parties et al
as 3:2023cv08081
Plaintiff:
Kirk Douglas Ball
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Phoenix Police Department, Ruby Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YANNUZZI v. BASTEDO et al
as 2:2022cv03818
Plaintiff:
DON EDWARD YANNUZZI, SR.
Defendant:
BRADLEY H. BASTEDO, MATTHEW WEINTRAUB, DR. JOHN MARKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Degante et al v. Markey
as 1:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Luis Degante, Diana Lee Perez, Joselyn Caridad Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Dr Markey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sherrick v. Marindino et al
as 1:2021cv01506
Defendant:
C O Jones, Lt Futrell, Ms Obong and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph G Sherrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gagliani v. Lexington County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv03737
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gagliani
Defendant:
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Lexington County Sheriff's Department, Deputy Jason Wilkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Ivey et al
as 6:2020cv01852
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norman Brown, III, Thomas J. Markey and Gary Mullane
Defendant:
Mike Demorat and Wayne Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. St. Marys Correctional Center et al
as 2:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Denver Wooten
Defendant:
St. Marys Correctional Center, Patrick Mirandy, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Harbin v. South Carolina DOC
as 15-6555
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. HARBIN, a/k/a Kevin Habin
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MCBETH, ROBERT HUTTO, JOHN H. HART and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WILLIAM R. BYARS, JR., Director, JOHN H. CARMICHAEL, JR., Deputy Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
