Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Castleman v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Castleman
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Steven Harpe, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougall v. Tyson et al
as 2:2023cv00785
Petitioner:
Marlon McDougall
Respondent:
Lieutenant Tyson, Nurse Freeland and Geo Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougall v. Tyson et al
as 3:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
Marlon McDougall
Defendant:
Lieutenant Tyson, Nurse Freeland and Geo Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougal v. Milwaukee County House of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Freddie James McDougal, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County House of Corrections, David Crowley, Ms Jewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougal v. Spalding et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
Damien McDougal
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Spalding, Correctional Officer Moore and Correctional Officer Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia v. Traylor et al
as 1:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
Alexander Noel Garcia
Defendant:
Sharon Traylor, Katie Mcdougal, Larry Desbrien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougall v. Yost
as 1:2021cv02096
Petitioner:
Gregory McDougall
Respondent:
Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mitchell v. Steelman et al
as 1:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eric Lebron Mitchell
Defendant:
P. Coyle, Barry Steelman and John G. McDougal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrary v. McDougal et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Plaintiff:
Timothy E McCrary
Defendant:
Georgia Correctional Industries, James Robberson, Carl Bear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Gradford v. McDougall
as 1:2019cv01795
Defendant:
McDougall
Plaintiff:
William J. Gradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
