Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kauwe
Defendant:
Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Backus v. Glassel et al
as 9:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Caterrion Backus
Defendant:
Kent Glassel, Scott W. Grimm, Caulder R. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colwell v. Palm Bay Police Dept et al
as 6:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Chad Colwell
Defendant:
Palm Bay Police Dept, City of Palm Bay, Matthew Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines et al v. Worby et al
as 4:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Quivadas Quadell-Lee Gaines
Defendant:
Kyle Worby, Keith Kimball, Zachary Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castleman v. Minot, City of et al
as 1:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Castleman
Defendant:
Minot, City of, Ward, County of, North Dakota, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwarz v. Sonoco Products Company et al
as 4:2019cv03447
Defendant:
Charlie Schmitt, Carolina Pines Regional Medical Center, Edwin B Pate and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Schwarz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Lancaster County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2018cv03156
Plaintiff:
Ernest E. Holland
Defendant:
J. Schwarz, Matthew F. Meyerle and Lancaster County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nguyen v. Young et al
as 6:2018cv00839
Defendant:
D. Betts, K. Keys, L. Schwarz and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Nam Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frostick v. Luem et al
as 2:2014cv00804
Plaintiff:
David M. Frostick
Defendant:
Andrea Luem, Patrick McDonald, Michael H. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Butler et al
as 3:2018cv03038
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jones
Defendant:
Richard Butler, Diane Schwarz, Ritz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
