Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Welch v. Tucson Adult Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ferrari Welch
Defendant:
Tucson Adult Detention Center, Pima County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Mines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Xavier v. C. Tanori, et al
as 22-15795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY RAYMOND XAVIER
Defendant / Appellee:
C. TANORI, Correctional Officer, E.W. BEAM, Correctional Officer, J. RAMIREZ, Correctional Officer and others
Xavier v. Tanori et al
as 4:2019cv05587
Defendant:
R. Ferrari, C. Tanori, J. Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Raymond Xavier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANTAUZZI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05166
Defendant:
JOHN E WETZEL, B. LUCCI, C/O CYNTHIA LINK and others
Plaintiff:
REINALDO FANTAUZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FANTAUZZI v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01492
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, B. LUCCI, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
REINALDO FANTALIZZI and REINALDO FANTAUZZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ferrari #209153 v. Lebarre et al
as 2:2018cv00125
Defendant:
Unknown Wilson, William Borgerding, Unknown Mattice and others
Plaintiff:
James Ferrari #209153
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2017cv00419
Plaintiff:
Trent Young
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Rogers, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Lashbrook et al
as 3:2016cv01321
Plaintiff:
Javar Stewart
Defendant:
Jacqueline Lashbrook, Michael D Scott, Lieutenant Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Monterey County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv03787
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Robinson
Defendant:
Monterey County Jail, Bernal, Mihu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broach v. Thomas et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tony Curtis Broach
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, C. Stewart, Corizon Medical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
