Cases 11 - 20 of 23
HARDESTY v. UNDERWOOD
as 1:2019cv00572
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD, PENDLETON and KINDERMAN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO HARDESTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDESTY v. PENDLETON
as 1:2019cv00570
Defendant:
UNDERWOOD, PENDLETON and KINDERMAN
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO HARDESTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDESTY v. LOOP et al
as 1:2018cv03987
Defendant:
ROY WASHINGTON, FRANK LOOP, S. PENDLETON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEO HARDESTY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIVENS v. NAJI et al
as 3:2017cv00222
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH J. GIVENS
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD GHASSAN NAJI , CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC , BARRY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willard Berry v. Brian Doss, et al
as 17-2565
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Willard Eugene Berry
Defendant - Appellant:
Brian Doss, SOD, NEACCC, Carol McFarlin, Counselor, NEACCC and Karen Hardesty, Treatment Supervisor, NEACCC
Defendant:
Jermey Sparks, ARO, NEACCC, Henson, Champlin, NEACCC, Coleman, Captain, NEACCC and others
Berry v. Doss et al
as 3:2015cv00378
Plaintiff:
Willard Eugene Berry
Defendant:
Brian Doss, Carol McFarlin, Jermey Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENLEY v. HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY et al
as 1:2015cv00845
Defendant:
ASHLEY HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY and BETH HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Youngpeter et al
as 1:2011cv00679
Plaintiff:
Reginald D. Jones
Defendant:
Michael Youngpeter, Keith Blackwood, Habib Yazdi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonetti v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00548
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Jack Ames, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonetti v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00452
Defendant:
L.C. Adams, Jack Ames, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antonetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
