Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Chapman v. Melton et al
as 3:2021cv03931
Defendant:
V. Minglana, F. Vasquez, R. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Lovelle Marquis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. HERITAGE TRAILS CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2020cv00598
Defendant:
R. PATTON, T. LOVELL and HERITAGE TRAILS CORR. FACILITY
Plaintiff:
BRUCE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Centerstone et al
as 8:2020cv00203
Defendant:
Manatee County Drug Court, Centerstone and Julie Stull
Plaintiff:
Cederic Lovell Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD et al v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 1:2019cv00972
Plaintiff:
LARRY J. VANDYKE, JIMMY CARL FRICK, EARL F. LOCKLEAR and others
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banschbach v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv00041
Defendant:
Joel Scheet, John Molendyke, Patrick Sheehan and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Banschbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECKES v. OCHELTREE et al
as 2:2018cv00559
Defendant:
KELLY LOVELL, NATHAN DUGGAR, CHANTELL KNEPP and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN ECKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDade v. Milwaukee County Sheriff et al
as 2:2018cv01190
Defendant:
CO Bagneski, John Doe, CO Warr and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lovell McDade, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Campbell et al
as 1:2018cv00767
Plaintiff:
Lovell Jenkins
Defendant:
C. Campbell, C. Allen and LNP Mulzter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECKES v. BYRD et al
as 2:2018cv00246
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, AMY HUFF, LOVELL and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN ECKES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovell Jones v. Department of Child Services, et al
as 18-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOVELL J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES and DAWN MOORE, Case Worker at Department of Child Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
