Cases 11 - 20 of 229
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50001
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, Illinois Department of Corrections, Latoya Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby #165484 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Brian Kirby
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, NaphCare, Ashley Pelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EARLS v. COLLINS et al
as 3:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND EARLS, III
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, BARR, TIPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henard (PS) v. Jefferson County et al
as 1:2023cv03072
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Jeff Shradder, Vital Core and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Nurse et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Steven C Hughes
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Jane Doe, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megan Stepansky v. Jimmy Lane
as 23-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY LANE, DAVID BOONE, SHARON BALLARD and others
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
