Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Dale Bryant v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 12-3171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dale E. Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Wendy Kelley, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Michael Person, Dr., Arkansas Department of Correction
Defendant:
Obi, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, Clyde, Dr., Diagnostic Unit, ADC, - Simmons, Mr., Nurse, Ouachita Regional Unit, ADC and others
Bryant v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Dale Bryant
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Obi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLOWERS v. HERRON
as 1:2009cv00676
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant:
TOD N. HERRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. LOWRY
as 1:2009cv00675
Defendant:
MITCHELL LOWRY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOWERS v. MCCASE
as 1:2009cv00673
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant:
MCCASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOWERS v. HALL
as 1:2009cv00674
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant:
JAMES HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOWERS v. JENKEN
as 1:2009cv00677
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant:
MIKE JENKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOWERS v. HAIRSON et al
as 1:2009cv00352
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MACK CLOWERS
Defendant:
MR. HAIRSON, KERMAT, ILLEGIBLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EuGene Clowers v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE CLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, COLIE RUSHTON, Warden of McCormick Correctional Institution, PARKER, of Classification, in their individual and official capacities and others
Moss v. Clowers et al
as 5:2006cv00421
Plaintiff:
Henry Marvin Moss
Defendant:
Officer Clowers, Co2 Ruff, Officer Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
