Cases 21 - 30 of 219
PARSONS v. DIRECTOR N.C. D.P.S. et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR N.C. D.P.S., MS. LA'FLOOR, TODD ISSHE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. DIRECTOR OF N.C. D.P.S. et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF N.C. D.P.S., DIVISION OF T.A.R.C. and DIRECTOR OF N.C.D.P.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. D.T.A.R.C. et al
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
D.T.A.R.C., F.T.A.R.C., N.C. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. N.C. PRISON OFFICIALS OF WAKE COUNTY
as 1:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
N.C. PRISON OFFICIALS OF WAKE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. CENTRAL PRISON
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
DANIELL BLAINE PARSONS
Defendant:
CENTRAL PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mallory et al v. Smith et al
as 0:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Mallory, Saddiq Al-Rahman Muhhammad and Mrs. Porshia Moneice Mallory
Defendant:
Phillip Smith, John Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Parsons et al
as 4:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Parsons, Gilliam, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Does
as 4:2023cv00985
Plaintiff:
Tiequail Brown
Defendant:
Does, Parsons and Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. John Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01200
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Watwood, Assistant Warden Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parsons v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03302
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Parsons
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, C. Mutts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
