Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Maurice Martin v. Doctor Estevar, et al
as 13-3123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE R. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR ESTEVAR, Dentist DDS, or executor of his estate, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, or employer of dentist, LOIS LINDORFF, health care administrator and others
Smith v. Williams et al
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Stanley Williams, James Deal, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LARSON et al
as 3:2013cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
D LARSON, DELAB and R MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. TIFFT et al.
as 3:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BERNARD ROBINSON, JR
Defendant:
R TIFFT, D LARSON, DEWATERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colin Massias v. J. Young, et al
as 12-30374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLIN LUDLOW MASSIAS
Defendant - Appellee:
J P YOUNG, R. MARTIN and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Massias v. Young et al
as 2:2011cv00769
Plaintiff:
Colin Ludlow Massias
Defendant:
J P Young, R Martin and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preacher v. George, et al
as 10-1500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUKE PREACHER, Sui Generis, Justice
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GEORGE, D.H.O. Officer, G. RAMIREZ, D.H.O. Officer, B.R. DAVIS, Warden and others
MARTIN v. HUBBARD et al
as 1:2009cv00876
Plaintiff:
JEREMY R. MARTIN
Defendant:
FREDERICK HUBBARD and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel Bishop v. Quierra Williams, et al
as 08-3086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL B. BISHOP, Iman R. Malik
Defendant - Appellee:
PETER FORBES, R. MARTIN, MICHAEL NEWMAN and others
LAFFERTY v. KLEM et al
as 3:2008cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W. Lafferty
Defendant:
Edward J. Klem, Jeffery A. Beard, Edward R. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
