Cases 31 - 40 of 126
Howerton v. J. et al
as 5:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Corp. Mitchum, Corp. Pack, Corp. Sampson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Howerton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Control Booth Officer et al
as 5:2021ct03034
Defendant:
Floor Officer, Control Booth Officer, Sargeant and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00168
Defendant:
Morehart, Woodard, Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Reco D Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kivinen v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 6:2020cv00870
Defendant:
Does 1-10, C Denise Finlay, Vanda Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
Sami Kaleva Kivinen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kivinen v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00870
Defendant:
C Denise Finlay, U S Dept of Homeland Security, David Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Sami Kaleva Kivinen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Booth
as 1:2020cv00921
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
William Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Franson et al
as 1:2020cv00923
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Ashley Franson and William Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv00890
Plaintiff:
RONALD IAN BOATRIGHT and THURMAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. BOOTH et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS, ERIC SMITH, D'ANGELO PHILLIPS and others
Petitioner:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LABOR COMMITTEE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2019cv00515
Defendant:
BOOTH, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and GLENN E YOUNG
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
