Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Schuessler v. Ryan et al
as 3:2014cv08041
Plaintiff:
David Wiley Schuessler
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Unknown Young, Unknown Valery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassell v. Dawkins et al
as 5:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Cassell, III
Defendant:
FNU Dawkins, FNU Guinn and Alexander Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Fauntleroy et al
as 2:2013cv00645
Plaintiff:
Milford Washington
Defendant:
Robert Fauntleroy, A. Beamon, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASSELL v. DAWKINS
as 1:2012cv00942
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. CASSELL, III
Defendant:
DAWKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDULLAH v. SCOTT et al
as 1:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
AMIR ISHMAEL ABDULLAH
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, TIMOTHY H CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS v. SCOTT, et al.,
as 4:2012cv00215
Plaintiff:
JOHN E WATKINS
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, EMANUEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATKINS, et al v. SCOTT, et al
as 4:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
JOHN E WATKINS, EDWARD LEE MCCLOUD, OWEN DENSON and others
Defendant:
RICK SCOTT, KENNETH TUCKER, ALEX TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAWKINS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2011cv04137
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. DAWKINS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDOWELL BEY v. WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX
as 4:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
COREY A MCDOWELL BEY
Defendant:
WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX, RUSSELL HOSFORD, CLERANCE CHASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Randolph v. Loretta Kelly
as 10-7654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT RANDOLPH
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden-Chief, KEITH DAWKINS, Unit Manager Housing Unit 4, R. WALLACE, Treatment Program Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
