Cases 31 - 40 of 760
TRIMPE v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
SARA TRIMPE
Defendant:
LANE and ALAMO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv07178
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Lane
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Loera, Acey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
LAWSON ALLEN
Defendant:
LANE and WEISINER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Williams et al
as 0:2023cv04299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lane
Defendant:
Joseph Williams (RD), Warden Jackson, Major Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
William Curtis v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2442
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM CURTIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Commissioner Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, J. BIRMINGHAM, PSS, T. BOLTON, PSS and others
Defendant:
STEWART, LAUREL R. HARRY, Department of Corrections Secretary, FRANCIS J. FEILD, PSS and others
GOLDEN-FIELDS v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
NICKI GOLDEN-FIELDS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Arizona State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Hall
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison, United States Postal Service, Arizona Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lane v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03259
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Alexander Lane
Defendant:
Billy Cooper, Charles Cooper, Officer Dzukiti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
