Cases 31 - 40 of 367
JOHNSON v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv06730
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, DONALD LEAVINS, JAMES PITTMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noel v. Leavins et al
as 3:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Noel
Defendant:
Donald Leavins, Mr. Pittman, Mrs. Shelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Cardenas, Bryant and Roland Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman #364680 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Edward Peblo Pittman #364680
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Bowne, C. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Norris et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Defendant:
John Doe, Michelle Norris, Jon Bell Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ray Pittman, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Gorman et al
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Darryl Elkins, Joyce Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Williams, et al
as 22-1441
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMANUEL PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN WILLIAMS and JANE DOE, LNP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
