Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Wilson v. Ashour et al
as 1:2018cv08217
Defendant:
Siccianoce, Tadesco, Swift and others
Plaintiff:
Qawmane C. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Defendant:
Hearington, Jane Doe, Pamala Malotte and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Ryan Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunham v. Najem et al
as 3:2018cv04467
Defendant:
J. N. Sullivan, D. E. Vargas, Z. D. Swift and others
Plaintiff:
John F. Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kersten et al
as 3:2018cv01436
Defendant:
State's Attorney Bloodworth, Cpl. Swift, Mr. Brashears and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swift #202475 v. Eldeman et al
as 1:2017cv00854
Plaintiff:
Keith Labronzo Swift #202475
Defendant:
Adam Eldeman and Corizon Medical Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miranda v. Swift et al
as 5:2017cv04000
Plaintiff:
Jerry Martin Miranda
Defendant:
R. K. Swift, G. W. Olson, R. Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keenan Wilkins v. County of Contra Costa, et al
as 17-16274
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS, AKA Nerrah Brown
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, DAVID O. LIVINGSTON, Sheriff, VANDERLIND, Lt. and others
Woodson v. McCollum, et al
as 17-6064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS D. WOODSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACY MCCOLLUM, in individual capacity, BRUCE BORNHIEM, in individual capacity, JOE ALLBAUGH, in his official and individual capacities and others
SEBOLT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CLINT SWIFT
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dulaney v. Elmani et al
as 5:2017cv00664
Plaintiff:
James Alvin Dulaney, Jr.
Defendant:
Elmani, Dewitt, J. Kay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
