Cases 61 - 70 of 3,027
Bone v. McConky et al
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Adam Lynn Bone
Defendant:
Matt McConky, Ronnie Stevens, Steve Coody and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andy Buxton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1405
Plaintiff:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MALINDA L. ADAMS, KAREN FEATHER and others
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant:
Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes
Defendant:
Reed, D. Horvath, J Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
