Cases 61 - 70 of 135
Clemons v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv06903
Defendant:
Officer Miranda, Cermak Health Service, Officer Ramos and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan B. Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurlbut v. Clark et al
as 6:2018cv06088
Defendant:
Nurse Goldman, Security Phone Technology Company, Corporal McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bryce Hurlbut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORELAND v. CLEMONS et al
as 3:2018cv01610
Defendant:
CLEMONS, NEAL and M STOKES
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MORELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Wexford Healthcare et al
as 3:2018cv01398
Defendant:
Jane Doe, C.A.O. Lamb, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Clemons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. BROWN et al
as 2:2018cv00274
Defendant:
RICHARD BROWN, S. DUGGER, B. HIATT and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY L. CLEMONS
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stribling v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv03479
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Ross Haynie, Duane Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLEMONS v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
CHE BERNARD CLEMONS
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, ROBERT TOOLE, MICHAEL CANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REAVES v. TIPTON et al
as 2:2018cv00085
Defendant:
LT. A. CLEMONS, ERIC FONSECA, JAMES JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN REAVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Piccinini et al
as 4:2017cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dameion E Clemons
Defendant:
Joe Piccinini and Jackson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Cook County et al
as 1:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Mark Clemons
Defendant:
Cook County, Thomas Dart, Superintendent Beacham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
