Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Smith v. Danials et al
as 1:2011cv01035
Plaintiff:
James P. Smith
Defendant:
Danials, Javernick, Olmsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Raymond, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. P. Smith and W. Hercules
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cullen et al
as 3:2010cv05219
Plaintiff:
Rick P. Smith
Defendant:
Vincent S. Cullen, Reynolds, D. Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferriel v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00325
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marvin Ferriel, II
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Grant E Harris, Mark Cashion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of California et al
as 3:2010cv02959
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Smith, III
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Biggins v. C. Danberg, et al
as 10-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. DANBERG, RICK KEARNEY, MIKE COSTELLO and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. LITTLE
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
Howard Banks
Defendant:
A. P. Smith, Fogg and Dr. Madan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrea Fields, et al v. Rick Raemisch, et al
as 10-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREA FIELDS, MATTHEW DAVISON, also known as JESSICA DAVISON and VANKEMAH D. MOATON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, ROMAN KAPLAN, JAMES GREER and others
Andrea Fields, et al v. Judy Smith, et al
as 10-2339
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREA FIELDS, MATTHEW DAVISON, also known as Jessica Davison and VANKEMAH D. MOATON
Defendant - Appellant:
JUDY P. SMITH, THOMAS EDWARDS, JAMES GREER and others
Branham #154900 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rodney Branham #154900
Defendant:
MDOC, William Smith, Unknown Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
