Cases 81 - 90 of 147
Taylor v. Naqvi et al
as 3:2017cv00920
Plaintiff:
Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Syed Johar Naqvi , Sohrab Zahedi, Raquel Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Mica
as 1:2017cv02958
Plaintiff:
Marquis S. Davis
Defendant:
Donald Mica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v Migala et al
as 2:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Marquis Chapman
Defendant:
Migala , Captain Lundmark and Achterberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARLOCK v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS CARLOCK
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA and HOYE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Ramey v. John Reilly, Jr., et al
as 16-4049
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. REILLY, JR., Superintendent, DONNA MELLOW, Asst. Superintendent, DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, Medical Director and others
Wright v. Kernan et al
as 4:2016cv06300
Plaintiff:
Marquis Laron Wright
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, C. E. Ducart, Laurie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKS et al v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00416
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Larry Olivarez v. Rodney Brown, et al
as 16-4028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry Olivarez
Defendant - Appellee:
Rodney D. Brown, Correctional Property Sergeant, Marquis L. Lundy, Correctional Lieutenant, EARU, Darren Daniels, Correctional Sergeant and others
PINSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00401
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, CHARLES DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS HICKS, JONATHAN JONES and JEREMY PINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
LEWINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2016cv02759
Defendant:
PATRICK COLLINS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS LEWINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
