Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SEELEY v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2021cv02347
Plaintiff:
JAMIE SEELEY
Defendant:
TALBOT, AGNES OPOKU, HANNAH SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Payne et al
as 6:2021cv06029
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jailer Scott, Deanglo Earl and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00087
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Deanglo Earl, Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gassel v. Brewer et al
as 5:2020cv06176
Defendant:
K Smith, Seeley, Mustain and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Gassel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv01529
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Richard E. Sise, Jeremiah J. McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. New York State Department of Corrections & Community Supervision et al
as 1:2019cv09128
Defendant:
Thomas Diina, Hon. Christopher J. Burns, Tina M. Stanford and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00151
Defendant:
B. FLINCHBAUGH, DEP. SUPERINTENDENT M. CLARK, J. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM J. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CHANEY v. BEDNARD et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Defendant:
SCI ALBION, SGT CLINGER, CO BRORELO and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN CHANEY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
