Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Poppell v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Nicole Poppell and Nicole (I) Poppell
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Board of County Commissioners for El Paso County, Colorado, The, Joseph Roybal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wheeler et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Elsun Wheeler and Freddie Davis
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Officer Tai, Officer McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00721
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bolton and Timothy Franklin Bolton
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Hugh Hood, Michael Borwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tay v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00501
Defendant:
Lieutenant Campbell, Assistant Warden Walker, Officer Garret and others
Plaintiff:
Tay Tay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HO v. COSTELLO et al
as 5:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
DUONG T HO
Defendant:
DEDEE S COSTELLO, ELIJAH SMILEY, JENNIFER ALANE HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casey Tay Johnson v. C. Gipson et al
as 2:2017cv00601
Respondent:
Beard, C Gipson, B. Moak and others
Petitioner:
Casey Tay Johnson
Johnson v. Gipson et al
as 4:2016cv06940
Plaintiff:
Casey Tay Johnson
Defendant:
C. Gipson, B. Moak, L. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Range v. Holladay et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Plaintiff:
Tai Range
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Thomisee and T Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Tate v. Tarry Williams, et al
as 13-3119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL TATE, also known as MS. TAY TAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY WILLIAMS, SANDRA FUNK, SALVADOR A. GODINEZ and others
Jackson #171107 v. Nelson et al
as 1:2013cv00827
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jackson #171107
Defendant:
William Nelson, Sherry Burt, Michael Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
