Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Gordon v. Manning et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
John Manning, Lee, Angela Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hain et al
as 1:2022cv06791
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Smith
Defendant:
Ron Hain, c/o Bowers, c/o Meza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JENNIFER ANNE PETERSON-BUCK, LINDA H. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Keaton v. Cartwright et al
as 3:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Robert James Keaton
Defendant:
James B. Cartwright, Anthony L. Smith, Howard A. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Antowin Vashia Porter
Defendant:
Jeffery Belk, James R. Cooper, Anthony L. Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hamilton County Government
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Smith
Defendant:
Hamilton County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Smith v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 22-15069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY BERNARD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, JIM ROBERTSON, M. HODGES and others
Smith v. Mathewes et al
as 2:2021cv03682
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant T.N. Mathewes, Officer Moss and Officer Barbie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gipson et al
as 3:2020cv01110
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith and Anthony Bernard Smith
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, David Blythe, Justin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
