Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Williams v. Wright et al
as 9:2023cv04663
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Michael Williams
Defendant:
Chuck Wright, Sgt. Clayton, Lt. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William N. Lucy v. Tahir Siddiq, et al
as 23-11578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM N. LUCY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAHIR TAHIR SIDDIQ, FOUNTAIN CF WARDEN, MRS. KRAUEL, R.N. D.O.N. and others
Smith v. Appling County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Eugene Smith
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center and Appling County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Appling County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
William C. Coleman
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Tahir Siddiq, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina #268030 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00204
Defendant:
Unknown Barsutos, Jullie Roberts, Unknown Pacheco and others
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alfred Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Lancaster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Officer Brown, Officer Hughes, Officer Cookie and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Lancaster et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00918
Defendant:
LPN Appling, Shah Saeed, Laurance McMillian and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Eugene Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Brunswick Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Brunswick Judicial Circuit, Mark Melton, Appling County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
