Cases 1 - 10 of 1,265
Woodard v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03126
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Woodard
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden L.B. Kelly, Safety Supervisor Muscle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crump v. Clemens et al
as 5:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Sheila Clemens, (fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Worlds et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Sean Lee Myers
Defendant:
Rachette Worlds, Dr Christopher Betts, James Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Gridley v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Alec Gridley
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonvie v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00616
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bonvie
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Vital Core Health Strategies et al
as 4:2024cv01756
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oneil Rouse, Jr.
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies and Natile Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
