Cases 1 - 10 of 522
Koroma v. Skinner et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Konbeh Koroma
Defendant:
Russell Skinner, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Beadle
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
William Thomas
Defendant:
Faye Beadle, R. Houston and Captain Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Houston Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Sgt. Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GINDRAW v. SANFORD et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
TAHMIR GINDRAW
Defendant:
LT. SANFORD and LT. HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott Myers v. Sheriff of Mobile County, Alabama, et al
as 24-10760
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MYERS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF MOBILE COUNTY, ALABAMA, JACKSON, SAM HOUSTON and others
Holt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Houston Holt and Abdul Maalik Muhammad
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, James Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Felts, K Derrick, Shelly Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. NAPH Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Andrew Houston Watson
Defendant:
NAPH Care, Montgomery County Jail, Lamarquis Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
