Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Bower et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Eugene Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ernest Bower, Tanya Blair, Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Estate of Michael Lee Alexander, Jr. (Anthony Gallagher, Personal Representative) v. Slaughter et al
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Lee Alexander, Jr. (Anthony Gallagher, Personal Representative)
Defendant:
Jesse Slaughter, Cascade County and John Does A-Z
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pearson v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00115
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pearson
Defendant:
Aramark Foods, Lee Alexander and William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. King et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Lee Alexander Brooks
Defendant:
Ronald King, Edia Coleman, Nikki Gowdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Pizer et al
as 2:2017cv00988
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Alexander, Sr.
Defendant:
John Pizer and Prison Legal Aid Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillman v. Beauchamp et al
as 2:2016cv00972
Plaintiff:
Robert Dillman
Defendant:
B Beauchamp, J Alan Shepard, Christine Duarte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Knucles et al
as 4:2013cv04228
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Alexander
Defendant:
Kristi N Knucles, R. Parin, M. Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Cake et al
as 3:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Donnell A. Scott
Defendant:
Lawrence Cake and Lee Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman v. Alexander et al
as 1:2011cv01331
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Norman
Defendant:
Lee Alexander and Steve Woodcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee Brooks v. James Newman, et al
as 10-60379
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEE ALEXANDER BROOKS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES NEWMAN, Sheriff, TONY ROUSE, Deputy Sheriff, JOESPH COTHERN, Deputy Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
