Cases 1 - 10 of 28
COOK v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. COOK and JAMAR M. COOK
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELLE FARRELL, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Foster v. C. Crosby, et al
as 23-15372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BARKARRI FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CROSBY, (C.O.), J. PUENTE, (SGT), C. PARRY, (Capt.) and others
Foster v. Crosby et al
as 3:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Barkarri Foster
Defendant:
C. Crosby, J. Puente, C. Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooks et al v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv04084
Plaintiff:
LaShea M. Cooks, Jason D. Woods, ShamaJay D. Woods and others
Defendant:
McKenzie Harris, Kim Watson, June Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendleton v. Cook
as 2:2020cv00660
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Pendleton
Defendant:
Warren M. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Bovencamp et al
as 3:2018cv05717
Defendant:
J Ross, K Henry, K Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suen v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv04020
Plaintiff:
David F. Suen
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Cook v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
George M Cook
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Franchesca Shoun, Chris Mathes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
George M Cook
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Franchesca Shoun, Chris Mathes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
